PACT '99 Paper Review Form


Please help the program committee in choosing very high quality papers, so that we can serve the PACT '99 attendees with the best possible technical program.

Regardless of whether you recommend acceptance or rejection, please provide technically substantial, detailed and fair comments that will help the authors improve upon their research, and appreciate your recommendation. Please do not hesitate to discuss the good points of a paper, where appropriate. Your comments can be as long as you like.

Please submit your review(s) by June 15th, 1999. The identity of the referees will be kept confidential. After submitting your review, a confirmation email will be sent to you, the corresponding PC member and PACT '99 simultaneously. Netscape is the preferred browser for this form.


Explanation for the "overall quality" rating: Explanation for other evaluation fields (starting with "technical content," ending with "confidence in your evaluation"):

REVIEW FORM
paper number
paper title

PC member name
(please select with mouse)
referee name
(leave blank if PC member)

referee affiliation

refereeing for

referee email address

overall score
(larger is better)

0    1    2    3    4   
5    6    7    8    9   
technical content
(larger is better)
1    2    3    4    5   
adequate references
1    2    3    4    5   
clarity
1    2    3    4    5   
length
1    2    3    4    5   
English
1    2    3    4    5   
organization
1    2    3    4    5   
originality
1    2    3    4    5   
interest/importance
to PACT 99

1    2    3    4    5   
confidence in your
evaluation

1    2    3    4    5   
consider acceptance
as short paper?
(please check box if yes)
comments for the authors
Please begin your comments with a short one paragraph summary of the paper.
You can create your comments with a text editor, and then paste them below.

comments for the program committee
(these will not be sent to the authors)